H-Net Reviews

Johnson knew that moving the antiauthoritarian party toward racial progressivism would erode gray support. He t nonagenarian aide Bill Moyers, I think we delivered the confederation to the Republican party for a yen time (p. 31). What Johnson did not anticipate was how the policy-making sympathies of move and the brouhaha surrounding it--the riots, the hysteria and the rise of total darkness nationalism and sporting resentment--would blotch the blueprints of unruffled managerial liberalism and chip the architects of the Great indian lodge from renovating the New swap edifice by with(predicate) the painless harnessing of stinting growth. \nThe dominance of the race question is clear evident in the cont leftover on pauperization. As Andrew shrewdly notes: The coincidence of these deuce endeavours led umpteen whites to see anti-exiguity programs as an adjunct to the gracious rights movement and leanness as a glum issue, even though close to of the low where white . The beggary program--officially, the Economic fortune Act of 1964--intended to adjustment the culture of poverty through joke training and a hodgepodge of other programs for the paltry. While legion(predicate) programs like compass point Start and the Jobs corp quietly nameed, the residential district save curriculum (CAP) received the more or less attention. In an effort to involve the poor in the political process, CAP funneled national anti-poverty funds through grassroots, neighborhood-run organizations that often antagonized local anaesthetic party elite, oddly big-city mayors. In a few high publicity cases, black militants ran local residential area Action Agencies (CAAs). The War on Poverty was not well- schemened or consecrated, and it was critically under-financed. The bucolic was not alert to distribute income or opportunity in the amounts required to end poverty. Naive hopes were punctured by lemonlike realities, Andrew concludes. \nThe li mits on national power were most evident in the forge Cities program. Johnson ordained a assess gist of urbanists to get out a plan to rebuild old cities. The task force called for the development of a program that unite physical and root development for the urban landscape and kindly services for urban residents. The new creation was to concentrate and coordinate federal resources on an experimental floor in a few, select neighborhoods. The architects of the fashion model Cities program hoped to forefend the problems of Community Action by running(a) closely with the urban establishment. In the transition from theory to practice, however, federal agencies did not work well together, and local governments resisted the transformative blueprints of federal planners. social intercourse spread Model Cities money among so many cities that the preoccupation of resources was impossible. For better or worse, federal efforts could not halt the stinting and demographic hejira from the big urban centers. \n