If you know you have Alzheimer's, how do you regard the person who will inherit your body? Is that person you? How is this case connected with philosophical theories of personal identity?

I discover that I have Alzheimers and that within the station of a year I will lose on the totally my memories and all my causa traits. I regard the soulfulness who will inherit my body during this time as 1 and the same person, numerically identical to the person who has been present in my body for my whole life previous to Alzheimers, but with a high take aim of qualitative identity. I reckon that it is not my memories that make me myself nor is it my character traits, but rather, it is the fact that there is bodily doggedness amongst me with unwrap Alzheimers and me without any of my memories. The case of whether adept holds this situation or holds a different go through is very most connected with the diverse philosophical theories of personal identity. These theories are that is to say the psychological tenaciousness view held by Parfit, the bodily continuity view, and the view that a endure person is marked out by their memories, held by Locke. Locke belie ved that for a person, Y, at T2 to be one and the same person as X at T1 he must telephone doing what X did at T1. He holds the view that a persisting person is marked out by their memories.

This view though can be easily argued against, for casing according to Lockes hypothesis a human being throe from total amnesia ceases to exist as that person and a new person is created. I believe that this is a defined weakness in Lockes theory. I would suggest that if one remembers ones actions and accordingly forgets them, it does not predict the end of a persons existence and the birth or creation of a new person. It i ndicates, rather, the need for Lockes theory! to be revised and updated for it... If you deficiency to get a full essay, dedicate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay